A backlink is a link on someone else's website that points to yours. That is the whole definition. If an industry blog mentions your company and links to your homepage, you have earned a backlink from that blog.
Everything else written about backlinks is elaboration on that one sentence, so it is worth getting the foundation right before the jargon starts.
Why search engines care about them
The idea is older than Google and comes from academia. If you want to know which papers in a field matter, you do not read them all. You count citations. A paper cited by hundreds of other researchers is probably important, and one cited by nobody probably is not.
Google's founding insight was that the web has the same structure. Links are citations. A page that many sites reference is likely to be worth showing, and a page nobody references probably is not.
That reasoning still holds, and it explains the single most important thing about backlinks:
Why links carry so much weight
Almost every other ranking signal is under your own control. You write your
own titles, your own content, your own structure, so those are cheap for
anyone to optimise or fake. A backlink requires a different person to
decide you are worth referencing. That independence is precisely what makes it
credible evidence, and why it is so hard to manufacture convincingly.
What a backlink looks like in practice
Strip away the terminology and a backlink is just a normal link, viewed from the receiving end. The same link is an outbound link to the site that published it and a backlink to the site it points at.
A few real shapes it takes:
- A reviewer writes about your product and links to your pricing page.
- A journalist quotes your survey data and credits your research page.
- An industry association lists you in its member directory.
- Someone answers a question on a forum and links to your guide as the explanation.
- A supplier lists you on their "where to buy" page.
All five are backlinks. They are not remotely equal in value, which is the next thing to understand.
What makes one backlink worth more than another
Four factors do most of the work. In rough order of importance:
- Authority of the linking site. A link from a publication with a large, established link profile of its own carries more weight than one from a site created last month. This is what scores like Domain Rating, Domain Authority, and our own Authority Rank are trying to approximate.
- Topical relevance. A link from a site in your field counts for more than an equally authoritative link from an unrelated one. A link from a respected gardening magazine does little for an accounting firm, regardless of how strong that magazine is.
- Whether it passes authority. Links carry attributes. A standard link passes ranking signal, while one marked
nofollow, sponsored, or ugc tells search engines not to count it as an endorsement. Nofollow links still bring traffic and credibility, they just do not move rankings directly. This is covered properly in dofollow vs nofollow.
- Context and placement. A link inside the body of an article, surrounded by relevant text, is worth more than the same link buried in a footer or a sidebar that appears on every page of a site.
A referring domain worth having
AR 76 / 100
Backlinks vs referring domains
You will see both numbers everywhere and they are not the same thing.
A backlink is a single link. A referring domain is a unique website linking to you, no matter how many individual links it sends. If one blog links to you fourteen times across seven articles, that is fourteen backlinks from one referring domain.
Referring domains is the more honest measure, because it counts relationships rather than repetitions. Fourteen links from one site is one site that likes you, not fourteen endorsements. When you compare yourself to a competitor, compare referring domains.
Ten links from one website is one relationship. Ten links from ten websites is
ten. Only one of those numbers tells you anything useful.
What a backlink is not
A few things get called backlinks that are not, and the confusion costs people money:
- Internal links point from one of your pages to another of your pages. Useful for structure and for spreading authority around your site, but they are not backlinks, and no amount of internal linking substitutes for external validation.
- Redirects pass authority but are not links anyone chose to place.
- Unlinked mentions are your brand named in text with no link attached. Not a backlink yet, but often the easiest one to get, because the writer has already decided you are worth mentioning and only needs to be asked.
- Auto-generated "backlinks" from generator tools are links on sites that exist solely to produce links. Search engines identified those patterns years ago. See do free backlink generators work for why they persist despite not working.
How to see the backlinks you already have
Two sources, and they complement each other:
- Google Search Console under Links, then External links, then Top linking sites. This is Google's own record of what it has counted, free, and available only for a property you have verified.
- A backlink checker shows what an independent crawler has found across the web, works on any domain including competitors, and needs no verification.
They frequently disagree, and the disagreement is informative. A link a checker sees but Search Console does not has probably not been counted yet. One Search Console lists that a checker misses is usually behind a redirect or on a page crawlers rarely reach.
See who links to your website, free
Paste your domain and get your referring domains back in seconds, strongest first, with dofollow status and anything new in the last 30 days flagged. No account needed.
Check my backlinks →
Where to go from here
Now that the definition is settled, the useful next questions are what kinds of links exist and how you actually get them: